Fake 'CMC Tokens' Trigger Crypto Scam Alert From CoinMarketCap
CoinMarketCap warns crypto users about fake 'CMC Tokens' scams!
U.Today1 min read
AI Won’t End Human Work, Andreessen Horowitz Partner Says
TL;DR
David George of Andreessen Horowitz claims AI will not lead to mass unemployment but will instead reorganize labor markets and create new industries. He argues that fears of an AI-driven job apocalypse are based on a flawed economic premise.
Key points
- David George argues AI won't cause mass unemployment
- AI will reorganize labor markets and create new industries
- Fears of an AI job apocalypse are based on a flawed premise
- The lump-of-labor fallacy suggests fixed work availability
- Experts are divided on AI's impact on white-collar jobs
Mentioned in this story
Andreessen HorowitzDavid George
John Maynard Keynes
In brief
- Andreessen Horowitz partner David George argues fears of AI-driven mass unemployment are historically unfounded.
- George says AI will reorganize labor markets and create new industries rather than permanently eliminate human work.
- Economists and developers remain divided over how disruptive AI could become for white-collar jobs.
As fears grow that artificial intelligence could wipe out white-collar jobs, Andreessen Horowitz general partner David George argues the technology could instead fuel a new wave of economic growth, higher productivity, and new industries.
In a blog post published on Wednesday, George argued that fears of an AI “job apocalypse” rely on what economists call the “lump-of-labor” fallacy, the idea that there is a fixed amount of work available in the economy.
“The problem with that premise is that it defies everything we know about people, markets, and economics. Human wants and needs are anything but fixed,” George wrote. “Keynes famously predicted almost a century ago that automation would lead to a 15-hour work-week, but of course Keynes was wrong. He was right that automation created a 'labor surplus,' but rather than just sit back and enjoy the ride, we found new and different productive endeavors to fill our time.”
CEOs, including SpaceX’s Elon Musk, and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, have warned that AI could dramatically reduce the need for some white-collar workers in the coming years. At the same time, Economists at the IMF and World Economic Forum have also projected that AI could significantly reshape global labor markets, with entry-level job postings in the US decreasing by 35% over the last two years due to AI adoption.
George argues that those concerns focus too heavily on task replacement while overlooking how productivity gains historically create new industries and economic demand.
“If automation caused permanent unemployment, the tractor should have broken the labor market forever,” he wrote. “Instead, farm output almost tripled, which supported a massive increase in population—and far from being permanently unemployed, those workers flowed into previously unimagined industries, factories, stores, offices, hospitals, labs, and eventually services and software.”
Q&A
What does David George say about AI and job loss?
David George argues that fears of AI causing mass unemployment are historically unfounded and that AI will instead create new industries.
What is the 'lump-of-labor' fallacy mentioned by George?
The 'lump-of-labor' fallacy is the belief that there is a fixed amount of work available in the economy, which George argues is incorrect.
How might AI impact white-collar jobs according to experts?
Experts remain divided on AI's impact on white-collar jobs, with some believing it will disrupt the market while others see potential for economic growth.
What historical predictions about automation does George reference?
George references John Maynard Keynes' prediction that automation would lead to a 15-hour work week, highlighting that automation has historically led to new productive endeavors.
