Arbitrum's Security Council has frozen 30,766 ETH linked to the KelpDAO hack, amounting to approximately $71 million. This unprecedented action raises questions about decentralization in the crypto space as it overrides the normal finality of chain-held funds.
Key points
Arbitrum froze 30,766 ETH linked to KelpDAO hack
The action was taken by the Arbitrum Security Council
Funds were moved to an intermediary wallet requiring governance action
The KelpDAO exploit resulted in a loss of about $290 million
Debate over decentralization in crypto has intensified
Arbitrum’s Security Council has frozen 30,766 ETH tied to the KelpDAO exploit, moving the funds out of an address on Arbitrum One and into an intermediary wallet that now requires further governance action to unlock. At roughly $71 million, the move was large enough on its own. What made it more consequential was the method: a crypto governance body stepping in directly to override the normal finality of chain-held funds.
In its statement, Arbitrum said: “The Arbitrum Security Council has taken emergency action to freeze the 30,766 ETH being held in the address on Arbitrum One that is connected to the KelpDAO exploit. The Security Council acted with input from law enforcement as to the exploiter’s identity, and, at all times, weighed its commitment to the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications.” The funds had been transferred to what Arbitrum described as an intermediary frozen wallet.
On-chain intelligence firm Arkham confirmed the action via X: ”ARBITRUM RECOVERS $70.9M FROM KELPDAO EXPLOITER. The Arbitrum Security Council just removed $70.97M ETH from the KelpDAO Exploiter’s addresses. They sent it to the address 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000DA0. North Korea stole the money and Arbitrum stole it back.”
ARBITRUM RECOVERS $70.9M FROM KELPDAO EXPLOITER
The Arbitrum Security Council just removed $70.97M ETH from the KelpDAO Exploiter’s addresses. They sent it to the address 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000DA0
— Arkham (@arkham) April 21, 2026
The frozen ETH is just one part of a much larger incident, as NewsBTC reported. KelpDAO was exploited on April 18 for about $290 million. LayerZero describes the event as isolated to KelpDAO’s rsETH configuration and tied to a single-DVN setup rather than broader contagion across the protocol. In a separate statement, KelpDAO said the April 18 incident involved a forged cross-chain message and later thanked Arbitrum’s council, ecosystem stakeholders and SEAL 911 for helping coordinate the response.
“We appreciate the recent decision by the Arbitrum Security Council to take action in response to the LayerZero-DVN/rsETH incident of April 18. Over the past two days, the KelpDAO team has worked closely and constructively with members of the security council […] We would like to particularly acknowledge the exceptional efforts of Security Alliance’s SEAL 911 among countless others, whose coordination, information structuring, and stakeholder engagement were instrumental in bringing clarity and urgency to this process,” KelpDAO via X.
We appreciate the recent decision by the Security Council to take action in response to the LayerZero-DVN/rsETH incident of April 18.
Q&A
What was the amount of ETH frozen by Arbitrum related to the KelpDAO hack?
Arbitrum froze 30,766 ETH, which is approximately $71 million, tied to the KelpDAO exploit.
How did the Arbitrum Security Council justify freezing the KelpDAO funds?
The council stated it acted to protect the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community, with input from law enforcement regarding the exploiter's identity.
What incident led to the freezing of funds by Arbitrum's Security Council?
The freezing of funds was a response to the KelpDAO exploit that occurred on April 18, resulting in a loss of about $290 million.
What are the implications of Arbitrum's action on the perception of decentralization in crypto?
The action has sparked debate over the true nature of decentralization in crypto, highlighting that a small governance body can still exert significant control over assets.
Coinbase Flags Proof-of-Stake Chains Like Ethereum, Solana as Potential Quantum Risks
Coinbase's advisory report warns that proof-of-stake blockchains like Ethereum and Solana may be vulnerable to future quantum attacks due to their reliance on validator signatures. While current quantum computers can't break modern cryptography, the industry is urged to prepare for potential risks.
Core Scientific Reveals $3.3 Billion Junk-Bond Sale to Pivot Further from Bitcoin Mining to AI
Core Scientific plans to offer $3.3 billion in speculative-grade debt to shift focus from Bitcoin mining to AI infrastructure. The funds will also be used to refinance existing debt and support the development of six data centers with CoreWeave.
That left the industry arguing over two different questions at once: whether the recovery was justified, and what it says about the systems involved. Griff Green, a member of Arbitrum’s Security Council, framed the decision as an extraordinary but necessary intervention.
“We did not make this decision lightly, there were countless hours of debates, technical, practical, ethical and political,” he wrote. “But all it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing, so today, we decided to do something.” The comment carried extra weight because Arbitrum’s council is not an abstract mechanism; it is a 12-member committee elected by the DAO to handle critical risks and emergency decisions.
Critics, though, saw the same event very differently. In one of the sharper reactions on X, commentator Deestar (@Deestar) argued that “while this is really great news, it’s a proof that almost nothing in crypto is truly decentralized.”
so basically Arbitrum security council moved $71 million in ETH out of the hackers wallet
desperate times shows the true nature of crypto space
the security council that made this decision are just 12 people, likely in the same location
— Deestar (@Deestar) April 21, 2026
He pushed the point further: “If your government comes after your money, only Bitcoin can save you.” That critique is more polemical than technical, but it goes straight to the fault line this episode exposed. A network can call itself decentralized, yet still retain a small, coordinated emergency body with the power to seize control of assets (when the stakes are high enough).
At press time, Arbitrum (ARB) traded at $0.1266.
Arbitrum price chart
ARB remains below the 20-week EMA, 1-week chart | Source: ARBUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
