Tron in Trouble? ‘Glaring Divergence’ Flagged Behind TRX’s Latest Surge
Tron’s TRX has surged over 23% but faces potential correction risks due to declining on-chain activity.
CryptoPotato1 min read
News
Economists Said AI Wouldn’t Take Jobs—Some Now Admit They Got It Wrong
TL;DR
A new study reveals that faster AI adoption is leading to job losses despite economic growth, challenging previous beliefs that technology would augment rather than replace jobs. Economists are now debating whether AI will eliminate the need for new job creation altogether.
Key points
- Faster AI adoption leads to fewer jobs
- Economists now see job losses with economic growth
- Debate on AI replacing the need for new jobs
- Study involved 69 economists and AI specialists
- Conducted by major research institutions
Federal Reserve Bank of ChicagoYaleStanfordUniversity of Pennsylvania
In brief
- A major multi-university study finds faster AI means fewer people working.
- Economists now see real job losses alongside strong economic growth.
- The debate has shifted to whether AI will replace the need for new jobs entirely.
For years, economists were the professionals most likely to tell you to calm down about any fear related to technology. ATMs didn’t replace cashiers, Excel didn’t replace bookkeepers and robotic vacuums didn’t replace maids. "Augment, not replace" was the consensus.
Well, that consensus is cracking.
A new paper from researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Forecasting Research Institute, Yale, Stanford, and the University of Pennsylvania surveyed 69 economists, 52 AI specialists, and 38 superforecasters about how AI will reshape the U.S. economy.
All three groups agree on one thing: Faster AI progress means lower labor force participation. That's the polite way to say “fewer people working.”
The numbers are staggering. Under what the researchers call the "rapid" scenario—where AI surpasses human performance across most cognitive and physical tasks by 2030—economists forecast the U.S. labor force participation rate dropping from its current 62% to 54% by 2050.
About half of that drop, roughly 10 million lost jobs, would be directly attributable to AI rather than demographics or other trends.
The rapid scenario isn't science fiction. It's the world where AI can negotiate book contracts, assist in any factory or home, and replace all freelance software engineers, paralegals, and customer service agents.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has already warned that the disruption is accelerating faster than most expect—and the study's rapid scenario effectively validates that framing. GDP tells the other half of the story.
Under the same rapid scenario, economists project annual GDP growth hitting 3.5% by 2045-2049—approaching post-WWII boom levels. AI experts are even more bullish, forecasting 5.3% growth. Tremendous aggregate wealth creation, concentrated at the top, with a thinner workforce to share it. The researchers flag that under rapid AI, the wealthiest 10% of households could hold 80% of total wealth by 2050—higher than pre-WWII inequality.
Q&A
What does the new study say about AI and job losses?
The study indicates that faster AI adoption is resulting in fewer jobs, contradicting earlier beliefs that technology would primarily augment existing roles.
How many economists participated in the AI study?
The study surveyed 69 economists, alongside AI specialists and superforecasters, to assess AI's impact on the U.S. economy.
What has changed in economists' views on AI's impact on jobs?
Economists are now acknowledging real job losses due to AI, shifting from the previous consensus that technology would not replace jobs.
Which institutions conducted the AI impact study?
The study was conducted by researchers from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Forecasting Research Institute, Yale, Stanford, and the University of Pennsylvania.
