
The AI-crypto disconnect: Why Pantera’s CEO thinks institutions are missing the boat on bitcoin
Pantera's Dan Morehead argues institutions are missing out on undervalued bitcoin compared to AI stocks.

Ethereum has significantly outperformed Solana in recent fee metrics, generating approximately $2.7 million in fees compared to Solana's $70,000. This 40-fold difference indicates a sustained lead in economic activity.
Ethereum and Solana are once again under close watch as fresh data reveals how both networks are performing, with recent fee metrics and on-chain activity offering a clearer picture of where momentum currently sits.
Recent figures directly address how both networks compare, showing Ethereum building a clear lead in economic activity. Data shared on April 24, 2026, by @ETH_Daily revealed that Ethereum had been generating more total fees than Solana for over a week. In the most recent 24-hour snapshot, Ethereum recorded approximately $2.7 million in fees, while Solana produced about $70,000. This 40 times gap highlights a sustained difference rather than a short-term fluctuation.

Source: Artermis
The fee chart tied to this update provides further clarity. Ethereum’s fee levels, which had been moving within moderate ranges earlier in the period, surged sharply toward nearly $2.75 million. In contrast, Solana’s fees fluctuated within a tighter band before declining significantly, eventually approaching minimal levels.
Beyond fees, on-chain data adds another layer to the comparison. On April 27, 2026, @CryptoQuant reported that Ethereum’s active addresses had climbed to record highs even as its price moved lower. The dataset, attributed to CryptoOnchain, shows activity nearing 600,000 addresses while price levels remain below previous peaks near $4,000 and closer to around $2,300. This divergence between rising participation and softer price action suggests that Ethereum’s usage is expanding independently of market valuation.
Ethereum generated about $2.7 million in fees, while Solana produced around $70,000 in the latest 24-hour snapshot.
Ethereum has been generating more total fees than Solana for over a week, indicating a clear lead in economic activity.
The 40 times fee gap highlights a sustained difference in network performance rather than a short-term fluctuation.

Pantera's Dan Morehead argues institutions are missing out on undervalued bitcoin compared to AI stocks.

MoonPay has launched a new division, MoonPay Institutional, following its acquisition of crypto key management firm Sodot for about $100 million. The division aims to support financial institutions entering the digital asset market.

Bitcoin ETFs have attracted nearly $2 billion in inflows this year, signaling increased confidence from institutional investors. 21Shares' CIO predicts Bitcoin could reach $100,000 by year-end due to growing demand from various investor types.

Polymarket aims to lift its four-year U.S. ban as CFTC Chair decides.

Discover the hidden drivers of token performance in this week's Crypto Long & Short.

Visa adds Arc, Base, Canton, Polygon, and Tempo to its stablecoin settlement pilot, boosting its network support.
See every story in Crypto — including breaking news and analysis.

Source: CryptoQuant
The combination of strong fee generation and increasing address activity points to growing demand, particularly in areas involving higher-value transactions and decentralized finance. The fact that users continue to transact despite higher costs indicates that Ethereum is capturing a larger share of meaningful economic activity.
Looking at the same period, Solana’s performance reflects a different activity structure. The network’s lower fee output suggests that transaction values are comparatively smaller or that overall high-value usage has declined. This does not diminish its role in the market, but it does highlight a gap when measured by revenue generated from network use.
The contrast becomes more defined when aligning both fee data and on-chain signals. Ethereum’s sustained lead in fees over more than a week indicates consistent demand for its block space, while Solana’s lower figures point to a network where activity is either less monetized or concentrated in lower-cost transactions. This difference is significant because fees are often viewed as a direct reflection of how much value users are moving across a blockchain.
At the same time, the divergence identified by CryptoQuant reinforces Ethereum’s position, with rising active addresses during a period of price weakness signaling sustained engagement. No comparable signal appears for Solana in the same dataset, leaving Ethereum with clearer indicators of growing usage. Overall, the data shows Ethereum with stronger underlying activity and higher economic throughput, while Solana reflects more moderately monetized usage during this period.
Ethereum price chart from Tradingview.com (Solana)
ETH price moves higher again | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Dune Analytics, chart from TradingView.com