

Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul has filed lawsuits against Kalshi, Polymarket, Robinhood, Crypto.com, and Coinbase, claiming their prediction market offerings are illegal gambling. The lawsuits aim to ban sports-related event contracts under state law amid increasing regulatory scrutiny.
Mentioned in this story
Wisconsin DOJ is suing Kalshi, Robinhood, Coinbase, Polymarket, , and their affiliates, to halt their alleged facilitation of illegal sports betting, a form of unlawful commercial gambling, in Wisconsin. pic.twitter.com/Jf8PMecXRq
— Attorney General Josh Kaul (@WisDOJ) April 24, 2026 Wisconsin cited the platforms' own marketing as evidence, including Kalshi Instagram ads that billed it as "The First Nationwide Legal Sports Betting Platform," and Polymarket's description of prediction markets as a “platform where people can bet on the outcome of future events.” the filings state. The state alleges Kalshi generates more than $1 billion annually from sports contracts—roughly 90% of its estimated total revenue. Wisconsin's enforcement action mirrors a lawsuit filed Tuesday by New York Attorney General Letitia James against Coinbase and Gemini over similar prediction market offerings. "Gemini and Coinbase’s so-called prediction markets are just illegal gambling operations, exposing young people to addictive platforms that lack the necessary guardrails," James said in a , adding, “My office is taking action to protect New Yorkers and stop these platforms from violating the law.”
Wisconsin alleges that Kalshi and Polymarket's prediction market offerings constitute illegal gambling operations and public nuisances under state law.
Kalshi reportedly generates over $1 billion annually from sports contracts, which accounts for approximately 90% of its total revenue.
New York has filed a lawsuit against Coinbase and Gemini for similar issues, while Connecticut, Arizona, and Illinois are also facing regulatory actions regarding prediction markets.
See every story in Crypto — including breaking news and analysis.
The state actions signal growing pressure on prediction markets from multiple jurisdictions simultaneously, amid an intensifying regulatory battle over who controls prediction markets. The Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which claims exclusive federal authority, have sued Connecticut, Arizona, and Illinois for attempting to regulate platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig has argued the agency must safeguard its regulatory authority, stating that Congress rejected the kind of fragmented state-by-state approach now emerging. The federal-state conflict leaves prediction market operators navigating contradictory regulatory demands, with Selig warning that failing to establish clear guidelines could drive operators offshore and increase the risk of FTX-style “implosions.” Wisconsin's lawsuit adds to mounting regulatory challenges for prediction markets nationwide, with two senators introducing a bipartisan legislative effort last month seeking to ban sports prediction markets entirely. New York and Illinois have prohibited government employees from trading on the platforms over insider information concerns, while a U.S. Army soldier was charged yesterday with using classified information to trade on Polymarket around the January operation to remove Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.