
OpenAI Rolls Out Advanced Account Security for ChatGPT Users
OpenAI introduces Advanced Account Security for ChatGPT users, enhancing protection with passkeys.

World Liberty Financial's WLFI token dropped 17% as a controversial governance proposal opened for voting, affecting over 62 billion tokens. The proposal includes strict vesting schedules for early investors and insiders, leading to significant backlash from the community.
Mentioned in this story
World Liberty Financial’s native token WLFI lost roughly 17% of its value on Wednesday as a governance proposal affecting more than 62 billion WLFI tokens officially opened for community voting — and the backlash was immediate.
WLFI was trading at around $0.06 at the time of writing, according to data from CoinGecko. That marks a 70% drop since the token first reached open markets, making Wednesday’s selloff the latest in a long string of losses for holders of the Trump-family-linked DeFi project. The proposal behind the price drop would impose strict vesting schedules on tokens currently held by early investors and insiders. Under the plan, early investors face a two-year lockup cliff, followed by two more years of gradual release. Founders, team members, and advisers get the same two-year cliff but with a three-year linear vest after that. Voting runs through May 7.
Token unlock proposal is now live for vote. ☝️ This is one of the most significant governance proposals in WLFI history. Here’s what’s at stake.
— WLFI (@worldlibertyfi) April 29, 2026 World Liberty Financial framed the move as a show of long-term commitment. “62,282,252,205 locked WLFI tokens are subject to this proposal,” the project said in a post on X. “None of it touches the market for a minimum of two years if passed.”
On paper, the vote is going well. As of Wednesday, 99.95% of cast votes supported the proposal, and the required quorum of 1 billion WLFI tokens had already been cleared, with 6 billion tokens in favor and just 3.2 million against.
The governance proposal imposes strict vesting schedules on WLFI tokens, leading to a 17% drop in value and significant backlash from token holders.
WLFI has decreased by 70% since its market debut, trading at approximately $0.06 at the time of the recent selloff.
As of Wednesday, 99.95% of votes cast supported the proposal, with over 6 billion tokens in favor and only 3.2 million against.
The proposal is seen as controversial due to its coercive voting structure, which risks locking tokens indefinitely for those who do not vote, and the long vesting period for early investors.

OpenAI introduces Advanced Account Security for ChatGPT users, enhancing protection with passkeys.

Chainlink (LINK) may be on the verge of a significant price shift as indicators suggest volatility ahead.

Ubuntu Linux plans to add AI features by 2026, but users are worried about privacy and unwanted changes.

Despite a nearly 12% drop, big investors like Cathie Wood are betting on Robinhood's recovery.

U.S. Senate unanimously bans senators from trading on prediction markets to prevent insider trading.

Bitcoin's rejection at $78,000 raises concerns about its rally's strength. Will it hold critical support?
See every story in Crypto — including breaking news and analysis.
All the $WLFI early investors who thought they were sitting on solid profits just got rugged, by the Trump family themselves.
This essentially gives them another shot at squeezing the same lemon they’ve been inflating with hot air for the past two years. Which, what a surprise,…
— Simon Dedic (@sjdedic) April 15, 2026 Moonrock Capital founder Simon Dedic was among the most pointed critics. Reports indicate he compared the proposal to a rug pull and raised questions about the timing — the two-year unlock period lines up with the remainder of US President Donald Trump’s time in office. Tron founder Justin Sun, who holds a significant amount of WLFI, called it one of the “most absurd” proposals he had ever come across.
The team behind World Liberty Financial said the vesting design was built to create what they described as a “more clear, bounded picture of governance preferences.” The goal, they said, was to keep tokens in the hands of people who are genuinely committed to the project’s future. The proposal was first submitted to the governance community on April 15 before going live for voting this week. World Liberty Financial called it “one of the most significant governance proposals in WLFI history.” *Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView*