
PCE, jobless claims and housing data test Fed cut hopes: Crypto Week Ahead
Upcoming U.S. economic data could shape Fed rate cut expectations amid ongoing geopolitical tensions.

New findings from Arkham reveal that over half of Zcash transactions can be linked to identifiable entities, challenging its reputation as a fully private cryptocurrency. Approximately $420 billion in ZEC transaction volume has been attributed to recognized organizations and individuals.
Mentioned in this story
The foundation of Zcash's identity is privacy. Zcash introduced shielded transactions, which completely hide the sender, recipient, and transaction amount, in contrast to Bitcoin, where every wallet movement is permanently visible on-chain.
However, new information from Arkham indicates that the situation is more nuanced than most users realize. More than half of all Zcash activity can already be identified and linked to recognized organizations, people, and entities, according to Arkham's findings.
Despite Zcash being promoted as one of the most sophisticated privacy-focused cryptocurrencies available, the platform says it has attributed about $420 billion worth of ZEC transaction volume.

The explanation is found in the way Zcash operates. The architecture of Zcash is still largely similar to that of Bitcoin. It relies on Proof-of-Work mining, has a 21 million supply cap, and employs the same UTXO transaction model.
The primary distinction stems from zk-SNARK technology, a zero-knowledge proof system that enables transaction verification without disclosing the underlying data to the public. But that privacy is not required.
Two address types are supported by Zcash: shielded z-addresses and transparent addresses, also referred to as t-addresses. Similar to Bitcoin, transactions between transparent addresses are still fully visible on-chain. Full cryptographic privacy is only attained by z-to-z transfers, in which the sender, recipient, and transaction amounts are hidden from the public.
Arkham has attributed about $420 billion worth of Zcash transaction volume to identifiable entities.
More than half of all Zcash activity can be identified and linked to recognized organizations and individuals.
Zcash offers shielded transactions that hide sender, recipient, and amount, whereas Bitcoin transactions are permanently visible on-chain.

Upcoming U.S. economic data could shape Fed rate cut expectations amid ongoing geopolitical tensions.

BNB Chain launches Agent Survival Pack, enabling AI agents to pay on-chain across six projects.

Ethereum at $2,120: Can it reclaim the 100-day MA?

Vitalik Buterin: Ethereum Foundation is not the center of Ethereum

HYPE surges above $60 as whale Garrett Jin builds his position with significant purchases.

Prometheum bets on broker-dealers for tokenized securities success.
See every story in Crypto — including breaking news and analysis.
In reality, the shielded pool is never reached by the majority of Zcash activity. For regulatory and compliance reasons, transparent addresses are strongly preferred by exchanges, custodians, and institutional players. This makes entry and exit points visible throughout the network, which is exactly the data that blockchain intelligence companies take advantage of.
According to Arkham, shielded addresses are still opaque and only show up as SHIELDED, but the surrounding flows frequently reveal enough metadata to track user behavior in any case.
The report even focuses on U.S. governance. Zcash allegedly found in one tracked wallet was taken from Alexandre Cazes, 26 year-old Canadian who's believed to be the person behind dark web marketplace AlphaWeb, following his 2017 arrest. Additionally, Arkham identified a specific trader who allegedly transferred money to Gemini weeks later, turning a $4.49 million ZEC purchase into a $6.6 million profit.
This does not imply that Zcash privacy is compromised. Pure shielded transactions continue to be cryptographically concealed. However, Arkham's analysis reminds us of a simple rule: privacy is more dependent on how users actually use the protocol than it is on the protocol itself.