TL;DR
Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has accused BlockDAG Network of stealing over $300 million from investors through scams promising unrealistic returns. The warning follows a similar alert from YouTube investigator Coffeezilla regarding a promoter involved in these schemes.
Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has publicly called out BlockDAG Network (BDAG) for allegedly stealing more than $300 million from unsuspecting retail investors through scams that promise them unrealistic high gains.
The warning was issued in response to a post by YouTube investigator Coffeezilla, who alerted his followers about a promoter that was running a similar scheme.
ZachXBT Exposes A Pattern In Crypto Scams
In his X post, the detective claimed that the online personality had blocked him after he reached out to ask about the 5-10% monthly return rate he advertises on his social media.
“If you invested money with ERIC MCNEIL, be warned,” wrote Coffeezilla.
Another X user under the name detective weighed in on the situation, saying that it was surprising to them how most people would accept the rate as reasonable. To this, ZachXBT responded by pointing out that such low-effort scams had become common in the industry.
The on-chain sleuth gave the example of how BlockDAG Network had managed to steal over $300 million from everyday investors through high-pressure sales tactics that tricked investors through the promise of a high return on their money.
He also shared screenshots of the project’s latest social media posts that featured it promoting extreme ROI using sales language like “$0.0000061 LIMITED SUPPLY, 95x POTENTIAL!” Another image also shows BlockDAG trying to create urgency through a message reading, “LAST 72 HOURS LOWEST ENTRY EVER at $0.0000022 for 85x on market price.”
BlockDAG’s History of Controversy
This isn’t the first time BlockDAG has been involved in this type of controversy. ZachXBT has been investigating the project for months, with his earlier findings suggesting a pattern of aggressive presale fundraising, misleading marketing claims, and leadership issues.
The scandal dates back to a little over two years ago, when the platform ran a presale during this period that repeatedly increased its fundraising targets while also offering people unrealistic 50x, 85x, and 100x potential returns. At the same time, the project was announcing that it had been listed on several exchanges and using sponsored articles as well as influencer advertising to appear legitimate.